The Tea House

His Impish Grin

Without a word, but nodding once in a show of keen understanding, the Buddhist master smiled, and all the Westerners who sat in a circle around his low tea-table immediately refocused their attention and pondered the meaning of this tiny gesture.

“It’s his mischievous side showing through,” a certain follower of his told me after, “his child-like prankster side.” She spoke with glutted satisfaction, as though her recognition of the man’s wise workings had been a privileged gift, something nourishing. I agreed, because I knew she was really talking about something else, the impish glee with which the masters in Chinese legends always deal with their pupils. She and I had attended similar classes in university where we studied similar stories, and when Master Wang smiled, he was really stepping out of a Sunday night in downtown Taipei and into the great classics we’d both both read in translation.

At the time, I hadn’t thought Wang’s placid smile seemed mischievous at all. It was too small, for one thing. Barely crimping the smooth lines of his wide face, it wasn’t large enough to be magnanimous but instead queerly timeless, like bound feet. Sweet, tender, it had the pity of a chess player who has seen his victory in the moves ahead, and knows his opponent is doomed.

I hadn’t paid much attention to the question he had been answering. As he listened to the translator, Wang played with one of the Chinese nick-knacks that always littered his tea table, turning it around in his hands as if pulling the memory of a apprentice-hood taichi form like a precious gem from this dull moment.

We were all foreigners. This was a special class weekly held just for us, and now, at the end of the night, it was our opportunity to meet and ask questions of the Master. New people always asked vague and probing questions, “What is good?” or “How can we act without desire?”, which is fair enough since better questions are hard to think of when put to the test. Sometimes a new person would come and Wang would take a special interest in them, at the sight of which we would all reshuffle ourselves into a new formation, treat the newcomer differently, hope that through our acceptance of them and the Master’s graces, we would too recognize whatever the Master had seen.

This young man, though, whose features I’ve forgotten, was new and getting little attention until he asked a question about global warming. Here, Wang suddenly perked up, and before answering, smiled his rare, soft-touching rebuke. Then, he explained why it had been a stupid question.

Firstly, environmentalism and global warming don’t matter in the least. In the Buddhist universe, the world is just one of an infinite number, where beings struggle through life, die, and are reborn according to their karma. A new world begins first with a sentient being, who, having a massive store of ‘good’ karma, is reborn in the highest position, and being present at the birth of the world, incorrectly assumes this makes them God. Soon other beings pop into the new world, being born as demigods or demons, or dogs, or wherever their karma leads. The world goes on like this for eons, and then ends. When it does, everyone is simply reborn into a different world, or perhaps creates their own.

The point is, when a world ends, everyone continues along their karmic journey as if nothing happened. What Wang informed us is that the survival of the Earth is irrelevant in every way, that however it ends, now or later, our reason for being continues unchanged and in total disregard.

People were aghast. This mini-revelation didn’t bother me much, though; I was there to study Taoism and qigong, not Buddhism, so after I had my conversation about the mischievous master and went on with my night, I mostly forgot about it. More than a year later, though, picking up the pieces of that experience and turning them over again in the gentle grip of my mind, I realize that this one surprise moment holds the key to the strange surreality that surrounded the whole affair, and the explanation of what went wrong, and the reason why I can’t go back to Wang and the Tea House.

2 Responses

  1. Lauren  •  December 13, 2008 @4:32 pm

    Very interesting response to the global warming crisis - something that is, I find, ill understood. While industrialized humankind is no doubt wreaking havoc on the Earth, there is by no means a scientific consensus that we are making the Earth warmer. One need only look at the Oregon Petition, signed by 31,000 American scientists, which states that carbon dioxide is not causing harm to the environment. Carbon DI-oxide, after all, is what plants breathe. The sweeping corporate “green” movement is capitalizing on the widespread ignorance of the general well-meaning population. There is no doubt that the industrialized nations cannot continue the unimaginable pollution that we are putting out. But we must be very careful before jumping on any global warming bandwagons. Who among us has actually read the Kyoto Protocols?
    That said, I find the Master’s response fascinating. I believe that humans most definitely have the power to manifest our own reality. The Earth is made up of energy, as are we, and there is an interconnectedness that we cannot deny. None of us know what lies outside our own reality.
    The Master’s response echoes that of other spiritual people I have heard - that the only change you can affect in this mad world is a change within.

  2. spbitticks  •  December 16, 2008 @3:16 pm

    Firstly, I agree with the problems with both the green movement and the green house gas issue. My point has always been (and remains) better be wrong and taking precautions than be right and surviving by sheer luck. Though that’s the only way I seem to get along, or rather wrong and with sheer luck, so what the hell?

    That idea you mention at the end, of changing oneself as the only means to change the world, is absolutely one of Wang’s key ideas, and one (like many of his) I agree with. I believe that his being flip about the end of the world (regardless of where the threat comes from, as his response didn’t have much to do with global warming) points at a larger issue, which I’m slowly building towards (cause I’m arty like that). So, look for Tea House #4 coming at you, where I tackle issues of the mind as my Master!

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



  • About the Author

    Sebastian Bitticks writes and instructs for some of the most popular magazines and respected institutions in Taiwan. Based in Taipei, as a freelancer and instructor, he has the freedom and flexibility to go where an idea takes him. On Pushing the Paper Line, he works to pull meaning from original experience and capture what falls between news, story-telling, and essay-writing.

    • Search